New Mexico Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,819
Stephens v. Luna County Detention Center
as 1:2024cv00877
Plaintiff:
Celso Stephens
Defendant:
Luna County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zamora v. Clovis Police Department
as 2:2024cv00868
Defendant:
Clovis Police Department
Plaintiff:
Anthony Zamora
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sedillo v. New Mexico Behavioral Health Institute
as 1:2024cv00864
Defendant:
New Mexico Behavioral Health Institute
Plaintiff:
Gilbert J Sedillo, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barr v. State of New Mexico et al
as 1:2024cv00807
Defendant:
Bradford Dalley, State of New Mexico, FNU Wiedeli and others
Plaintiff:
Derek Barr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LaCasse v. Otero County Prison Facility et al
as 2:2024cv00806
Plaintiff:
Jesse L. LaCasse
Defendant:
Otero County Prison Facility and Southern New Mexico Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Enriquez v. Dona Ana County Detention Center et al
as 1:2024cv00805
Defendant:
Brian Baker, Luis Lucero, Joab Puente and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel C Enriquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Steward v. Bowman et al
as 2:2024cv00798
Plaintiff:
Joseph Saul Steward
Defendant:
Erica Romero, Doug Bowman, FNU Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soto v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00774
Defendant:
Administrator John Doe
Plaintiff:
Narcizo Soto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitehead v. LNU
as 1:2024cv00762
Defendant:
FNU LNU
Plaintiff:
Clayton Wade Whitehead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De Herrera v. Garcia
as 1:2024cv00747
Defendant:
FNU Garcia
Plaintiff:
Julian De Herrera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
