US District Court for the Eastern District of New York Other Statutes Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 134
Great Northern Insurance Company v. Lank et al
as 1:2010cv04333
Defendant:
Arpin Van Lines, Inc., Atlantic Fine Art Services Inc. and Ellsworth Lank
Plaintiff:
Great Northern Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Con-Way Freight, Inc. v. Purolator USA, Inc.
as 2:2010cv04054
Plaintiff:
Con-Way Freight, Inc.
Defendant:
Purolator USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11702 (a)(4) Violations of Interstate Commerce A
Con-Way Freight, Inc. v. Wall Tool & Tape Corp.
as 2:2010cv03163
Plaintiff:
Con-Way Freight, Inc.
Defendant:
Wall Tool & Tape Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
United States of America v. Brooklyn Sleep Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02980
Defendant:
Brooklyn Sleep Products, Inc. and Francisco Chavez
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Dahl v. Mott's LLP et al
as 1:2010cv02976
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dahl
Defendant:
Dr. Pepper Snapple Group and Mott's LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Yourgal v. Smithtown Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01405
Defendant:
Patricia C. Delaney, George H. Duncan, Anita M. Florek and others
Plaintiff:
George Yourgal
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Waterford Township Police & Fire Retirement System v. Smithtown Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00864
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Donnelly Commodities, Inc.
as 2:2010cv00386
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Con-Way Freight, Inc. v. Vintage Graphic Arts, Ltd.
as 2:2009cv05431
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11702 (a)(4) Violations of Interstate Commerce A
Manchester Marine Underwriters Limited v. Qatar Airways
as 1:2009cv05139
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
