US District Court for the Eastern District of New York Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 4,459
Harringan v. Miller
as 1:2022cv07562
Petitioner:
William Harringan
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Superintendent, Elmira Correctional Facility
as 2:2022cv07396
Plaintiff:
Erwin Jackson
Defendant:
Superintendent, Elmira Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dumervil v. Wolcott
as 1:2022cv07380
Petitioner:
Ricardy Dumervil
Respondent:
Julia Wolcott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Herring v. Miller
as 2:2022cv06693
Petitioner:
Melvin J. Herring
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kingsberry v. Rockwood
as 1:2022cv06516
Petitioner:
Victorious Kingsberry
Respondent:
Mark Rockwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mayo v. Montagari
as 1:2022cv06489
Petitioner:
Maurice Mayo
Respondent:
A. Montagari
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ishmael v. Montagari
as 1:2022cv06458
Petitioner:
Darryel Ishmael
Respondent:
A. Montagari
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony v. Warden of Suffolk Jail
as 2:2022cv06492
Petitioner:
Obdul Anthony
Respondent:
Warden of Suffolk Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lopez v. Residential Reentry Manager
as 1:2022cv06331
Petitioner:
Ernesto Lopez
Respondent:
Residential Reentry Manager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gonzalez v. Montagari
as 1:2022cv06245
Petitioner:
German Gonzalez
Respondent:
A. Montagari
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
