US District Court for the Northern District of New York Contract Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
SAWABINI v. BECERRA et al
as 3:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Lutfallah T. Sawabini
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra and LIVANTA LLC BFCC QIO MEDICARE CONTRATOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2345 Medicare Recovery
Lancy v. Aetna Inc.
as 5:2022cv00950
Plaintiff:
Kathleen L. Lancy
Defendant:
Aetna Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Plante v. Dake et al
as 1:2014cv00106
Plaintiff:
Joan Patricia Plante
Defendant:
Gary Dake , Joanne McDermott and The Stewart's Shops Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Alano v. Sebelius et al
as 5:2012cv01833
Plaintiff:
Frances M. Alano
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius, Eric H. Holder and Richard S. Hartunian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Rosario v. Oxford Health Plans (NY), Inc.
as 1:2010cv01158
Plaintiff:
Jennie Rosario
Defendant:
Oxford Health Plans (NY), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Benedictine Hospital v. Sebelius et al
as 1:2010cv00868
Plaintiff:
Benedictine Hospital
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius and National Government Services Blue Cross/Blue Shield Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Kenny & Kenny, PLLC et al v. Onondaga County Department of Social Services et al
as 5:2010cv00193
Plaintiff:
Kenny & Kenny, PLLC and Michael P. Kenny, Esq.
Defendant:
Onondaga County Department of Social Services, Ingenix, Inc., United Healthcare Insurance Company of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Kingston Hospital v. Sebelius et al
as 1:2009cv01303
Plaintiff:
Kingston Hospital and Kingston Hospital
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius and National Government Services Blue Cross / Blue Shield Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
People of the State of New York v. Pharmacia Corporation
as 1:2005cv00872
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
