U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Flores v. Van Galder Coach USA Bus Company
as 1:2025cv00684
Plaintiff:
Valerie Flores
Defendant:
Van Galder Coach USA Bus Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Goldstein v. Gabbit, LLC
as 1:2025cv00318
Plaintiff:
Seth Goldstein
Defendant:
Gabbit, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Doe v. Miller
as 3:2024cv01267
Defendant:
Vsem Miller-Yenovkian, Brian Miller, Vem Steinberg and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Waks v. A&H Security Services, LLC
as 1:2024cv00951
Defendant:
Tammy Kulzer and A&H Security Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Joel Waks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal Libel,Assault,Slander
Blowers, et al. v. Giardino, et al.
as 1:2024cv00673
Defendant:
Facebook, County of Fulton New York, WGY Radio and others
Plaintiff:
N. B., Jason T. Blowers, Sr. and J. B.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Tangorre v. Bratt
as 1:2024cv00388
Plaintiff:
Brian Tangorre
Defendant:
Jennifer Bratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Kubasiak v. Shaw
as 5:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Trent A. Kubasiak
Defendant:
Cedrah J. Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Doe et al v. Rees
as 3:2024cv00274
Defendant:
Jonathan Rees, Greg Ellis, Johnathan Rees and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, John Doe, II, John Doe, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Harrington v. Crouse Hospital et al
as 5:2023cv01468
Plaintiff:
Janice Harrington
Defendant:
Crouse Hospital and Byuong Ryu, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Doe v. Rees
as 3:2023cv01352
Defendant:
Jonathan Rees, Greg Ellis and Jonny Rees
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
