US District Court for the Northern District of New York Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 70
PDO Max, Inc. et al v. Malcmacher
as 5:2021cv01274
Plaintiff:
PDO Max, Inc. and Rejuvn8, LLC
Defendant:
Louis Malcmacher, DDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eggsware v. East Coast Syndicate et al
as 1:2021cv01064
Plaintiff:
Shawn Eggsware
Defendant:
East Coast Syndicate, Davco Masonry, LLC and New York Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willey v. Town of Clifton Park et al
as 1:2021cv00877
Plaintiff:
Carlton B. Willey and Carl Willey
Defendant:
"John" Walsh, Town of Clifton Park, Shenendehowa Central School District and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gilmore et al v. Uncommon School Troy Prep et al
as 1:2020cv00979
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Gilmore and Darryl A. Gilmore, Sr.
Defendant:
Uncommon School Troy Prep, Johanna Martin and Maise Wright
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
Potts v. Potts
as 3:2019cv01403
Plaintiff:
Shannon R. Potts
Defendant:
Blyden Potts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Powers-Barnhard v. Butler et al
as 5:2019cv01208
Defendant:
GLV, Inc., Rick Butler, U.S.A. Volleyball and others
Plaintiff:
Sarah Powers-Barnhard
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal Libel,Assault,Slander
DOE v. Smith
as 1:2019cv01121
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
John Smith
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Scheffel v. Perry-Scheffel et al
as 1:2018cv00540
Plaintiff:
Bernard Scheffel
Defendant:
Ursula Perry-Scheffel and Woodstock Mobiles, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Garvey v. Wegmans et al
as 5:2018cv00255
Plaintiff:
Shaun Garvey
Defendant:
Onondaga County Sheriff Department and Wegmans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Goldowsky et al v. Gareri et al
as 1:2018cv00212
Defendant:
PCI Inc and Aldo Gareri
Plaintiff:
Michael P Goldowsky and Gold Medal Technologies Heart Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
