US District Court for the Southern District of New York Other Statutes Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 29,017
570 CONCRETE, LLC v. Sika AG et al
as 1:2024cv03045
Plaintiff:
570 CONCRETE, LLC
Defendant:
Sika AG, Sika Corporation, Compagnie De Saint-Gobain S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
M&D Peterson, LLC v. SIKA AG et al
as 1:2024cv03056
Not Yet Classified:
IN RE CONCRETE & CEMENT ADDITIVES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
M&D Peterson, LLC
Defendant:
Sika AG, Sika Corporation, Chryso, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
DiFalco v. SoulCycle, LLC
as 1:2024cv03103
Plaintiff:
Ian DiFalco
Defendant:
SoulCycle, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Federal Trade Commission v. Tapestry, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03109
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Tapestry, Inc. and Capri Holdings Limited
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 53 b Prelim & Perm Inj Relief & other Equitable Relief
LAKEWOOD CONCRETE CORP. v. SIKA AG et al
as 1:2024cv03026
Plaintiff:
LAKEWOOD CONCRETE CORP.
Defendant:
Sika AG, Sika Corporation, Chryso, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
KEYSTONE CONCRETE BLOCK & SUPPLY CO. INC. v. Sika AG et al
as 1:2024cv03033
Plaintiff:
KEYSTONE CONCRETE BLOCK & SUPPLY CO. INC.
Defendant:
Sika AG, Sika Corporation, Chryso, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
MW Gestion v. Global Cord Blood Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv03071
Plaintiff:
MW Gestion
Defendant:
Global Cord Blood Corporation, Ting Zheng, Bing Chuen (Albert) Chen and others
Joseph v. Leverton et al
as 1:2024cv03081
Plaintiff:
Andrew Joseph
Defendant:
Jamie Leverton, Shenif Visram, Joseph Flinn and others
Google LLC v. Havas Media Group USA LLC
as 1:2024cv03063
Plaintiff:
Google LLC
Defendant:
Havas Media Group USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
