Southern District of New York Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 4,422
DeJesus v. The People Of The State Of New York
as 1:2017cv03932
Petitioner: Roberto Dejesus
Respondent: The People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patel v. Smith
as 1:2017cv03837
Petitioner: Amit Patel
Respondent: Brandon J. Smith
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ndou v. Decker et al
as 1:2017cv03811
Respondent: Thomas Decker, John Kelly, Jefferson B. Sessions and others
Petitioner: Laureta NDOU
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Santana v. Griffin
as 1:2017cv03827
Petitioner: Daniel A. Santana
Respondent: Thomas Griffin
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patel v. Smith
as 1:2017cv03796
Petitioner: Amit Patel
Respondent: Brandon J. Smith
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Szabo v. Jane Doe 1 et al
as 1:2017cv03744
Petitioner: Jessica Szabo
Respondent: Jane Doe #1, New York State Office of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Miller v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv03488
Petitioner: Melvin Miller
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hopkins v. Language Testing International et al
as 1:2017cv03028
Plaintiff: Lyman Hopkins
Defendant: Language Testing International, Diane Archer
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv03116
Petitioner: Derryl Moore
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fusco v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv02974
Petitioner: Emilio Fusco
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?