US District Court for the Western District of New York Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 2,185
Jones v. Capra
as 6:2022cv06405
Petitioner:
Daniel Jones
Respondent:
Michael Capra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGloun v. Passage
as 6:2022cv06400
Petitioner:
Jovon McGloun
Respondent:
Mark Passage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lowry v. Rawson
as 1:2022cv00688
Petitioner:
Xavier A. Lowry
Respondent:
Bryce Rawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parish v. Montgeery
as 1:2022cv00677
Petitioner:
Gregory P. Parish
Respondent:
Montgeery and Superintendent A. Montegari
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Laws v. Milby
as 6:2022cv06375
Petitioner:
Ryan J. Laws
Respondent:
Sheriff Robert Milby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Superintendent, Elmira Correctional Facility
as 1:2022cv00666
Petitioner:
Erwin Jackson
Respondent:
Superintendent, Elmira Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Corey
as 6:2022cv06347
Petitioner:
Earl J. Wilson
Respondent:
Corey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2022cv06342
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Rochester Police Department, Colon Blind and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Corey
as 1:2022cv00618
Petitioner:
Artis L. Miller
Respondent:
Joseph E. Corey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Manners v. Jone
as 6:2022cv06328
Petitioner:
Shaquille O. Manners
Respondent:
Gerard Jone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
