US District Court for the Western District of New York Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 6,888
Young v. USA
as 6:2023cv06266
Petitioner:
James Oliver Young
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Prince v. Reinhart et al
as 1:2023cv00414
Plaintiff:
Raymond Prince
Defendant:
Reinhart and Paul Piccolo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hennessy v. Monroe County et al
as 6:2023cv06249
Plaintiff:
Collin James Hennessy
Defendant:
Monroe County, Sheriff Todd Baxter, B. Emerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Department of Homeland Security
as 1:2023cv00399
Petitioner:
Ramon Kelly
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jimenez v. Searls
as 1:2023cv00379
Petitioner:
David De Oliveira Jimenez
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robert v. Central New York Psychiatric Center
as 1:2023cv00382
Plaintiff:
Dimitri Robert
Defendant:
Central New York Psychiatric Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soutemenides v. Rivera et al
as 1:2023cv00381
Plaintiff:
Petros Soutemenides
Defendant:
M. Rivera, R. Ewing, Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanford v. USA
as 6:2023cv06232
Petitioner:
James Edward Sandford, III
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sloane v. Annucci et al
as 6:2023cv06231
Plaintiff:
Derek Sloane
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Carol Moore, Superintendent LaManna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. USA
as 1:2023cv00378
Petitioner:
Isiah Pierce
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
