U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York Forfeiture / Penalty Cases

Cases filed
Cases 11 - 20 of 883
United States of America v. $6,160 United States Currency
as 1:2023cv01262
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $6,160 United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. The Premises and Real Property with Buildings, Appurtenances, and Improvements at 5061 Rockhaven Drive, Clarence, New York,
as 1:2023cv01226
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: The Premises and Real Property at 5061 Rockhaven Drive, Clarence, New York and The Premises and Real Property with Buildings, Appurtenances, and Improvements at 5061 Rockhaven Drive, Clarence, New York,
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
United States of America v. The Premises and Real Property at 7122 Larry Court, North Tonawanda, New York We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01059
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: The Premises and Real Property at 7122 Larry Court, North Tonawanda, New York
Claimant: Michael Ostolski and Dawn Ostolski
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. All Contract Rights, Interest in & any Payments due on 50 Membership Units in Monterra Holdings LLC, held by Michael Luehrsen and/or YP Development, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01003
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: All Contract Rights, Interest in & any Payments due on 50 Membership Units in Monterra Holdings LLC, held by Michael Luehrsen, et. al., All Contract Rights, Interest in & any Payments due on 50 Membership Units in Monterra Holdings LLC, held by Michael Luehrsen and/or YP Development, LLC, All Contract Rights, Interest in and any Payments due on Michael Luehrsens 10% Class A membership interest in C3 Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. One 2017 Bentley Mulsanne, VIN: SCBBG7ZH5HC002930 Titled and Registered to David B. Scrivani
as 1:2023cv00941
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: One 2017 Bentley Mulsanne, VIN: SCBBG7ZH5HC002930 Titled and Registered to David B. Scrivani
Claimant: David B. Scrivani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. $27,909 United States Currency
as 1:2023cv00910
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $27,909 United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. One (1) Remington Arms Co. Model 14A, 35 REM caliber rifle, bearing serial no. C73727, et al
as 1:2023mc00030
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: One (1) Remington Arms Co. Model 14A, 35 REM caliber rifle, bearing serial no. C73727, One (1) Savage Arms Inc. Mark II .22 caliber rifle, bearing serial no. 3951680, One (1) Anderson Manufacturing, Model AM-15 Multi, .300 Blackout caliber short barrel rifle, bearing serial no. 21134370 and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $60,438 United States Currency
as 1:2023cv00776
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $60,438 United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $267,808.00 in United States Currency et al
as 6:2023cv06353
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $267,808.00 in United States Currency, One 10k Rose Gold Diamond Chain with Spade Design on Clasp and One 18k Rose Gold Rolex Oyster Perpetual Watch
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $51,231.00 United States Currency We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv06288
Plaintiff: USA and United States of America
Defendant: $51,231.00 United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?