New York Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,529
Malik-Scott v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2025cv02661
Plaintiff:
Nasim Malik-Scot
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Edden v. Dudek
as 2:2025cv01425
Plaintiff:
Megan Kathleen Edden
Defendant:
Leland Dudek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Baroutakis v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2025cv01688
Plaintiff:
Mary Baroutakis
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Tudor v. King
as 2:2025cv01128
Plaintiff:
Dan T. Tudor
Defendant:
Michelle King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Alessi v. King
as 2:2025cv00679
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Alessi
Defendant:
Michelle King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Flores v. Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2025cv00617
Plaintiff:
Josue Flores
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Michelle King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Farrell v. Colvin
as 2:2025cv00322
Plaintiff:
Patricia Anne Farrell
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cardoso v. Colvin
as 1:2025cv00504
Plaintiff:
Domingos Desousa Cardoso
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 rsReview of HHS Decision (RSI)
Mahmood v. Colvin
as 1:2025cv00224
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Yasir Mahmood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pedretti v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2025cv00048
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Pedretti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
