US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Contract Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 40
v. Medicare et al
as 3:2010cv01289
Defendant:
Medicare , Social Security Administration and Lavetta Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Danelishen v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
as 1:2010cv00137
Plaintiff:
James Danelishen
Defendant:
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
United States of America v. Progressive Quality Care, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00514
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Progressive Quality Care, Inc.
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Batt v. Maximus Federal Services
as 1:2009cv00162
Plaintiff:
Rose A. Batt
Defendant:
Maximus Federal Services and Maximus Federal Services
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Western Reserve Care System v. Sec. of Dept. Health and Human Svc.
as 4:2007cv01979
Plaintiff:
Western Reserve Care System and Western Reserve Care System
Defendant:
Secretary of the Department of Health And Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2345 Medicare Recovery
Gobrecht, et al v. McGee
as 3:2007cv01202
Plaintiff:
Jodi S. Gobrecht, Jodi S. Gobrecht, John W. Gobrecht and others
Defendant:
James P. McGee, James P. McGee, James P. McGee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
St Vincent Mercy Medical Center v. Leavitt
as 3:2005cv07485
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Kudla et al
as 5:2005cv00072
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Giesse v. Secretary of the Department of Health And Human Services et al
as 1:2004cv02536
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
United States of America v. Bruns
as 1:2004cv01882
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Medical Care Recovery
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
