US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Torts - Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 487
Barringer v. State of Ohio
as 3:2023cv01530
Plaintiff:
Kyle Barringer
Defendant:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Harris v. Donley's Inc.
as 1:2023cv01400
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Harris
Defendant:
Donley's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lucas v. State of Ohio
as 3:2023cv01401
Plaintiff:
Kejuan Lucas
Defendant:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Maersk Oil Trading Inc. v. B&G Futures Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00951
Plaintiff:
Maersk Oil Trading, Inc.
Defendant:
B&G Futures, Inc., Chirag Vyas and Steve DiPietro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
McKind v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 3:2023cv00882
Plaintiff:
Roland G. McKind
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association, PHH Mortgate Company, MTGLQ Investors, L.P. and others
Harden Cement Corp. LLC v. Fortress Cement, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00845
Plaintiff:
Harden Cement Corp. LLC
Defendant:
Fortress Cement, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Gales et al v. Porteus et al
as 5:2023cv00706
Plaintiff:
Lachanda Gales and J.C. Sanders
Defendant:
Jack Porteus and National Asset Recovery Specialists, Inc.
McKind v. Lucas County Board of Commissioner
as 3:2023cv00467
Plaintiff:
Ronald McKind and Roland G. McKind
Defendant:
Lucas County Board of Commissioner and Judge Eric Allen Marks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas Remodeling v. Sherwin-Williams Company
as 1:2023cv00459
Plaintiff:
Thomas Remodeling and Brandi Bagley
Defendant:
Sherwin-Williams Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Boone v. Fay et al
as 5:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Boone
Defendant:
Lisa Fay, John Foster and Sharon Spence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
