US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 4,803
SILVANI et al v. Chang et al
as 1:2023oe00221
Plaintiff:
MARY SILVANI, JOHN SILVANI and CLIFFORD CABANSAG
Defendant:
Charles Chang, kristen Chen, Stacey Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Roy v. Menard Inc.
as 2:2023cv01362
Plaintiff:
Michael Roy
Defendant:
Menard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Recovery Works Healing Center LLC v. Bobbitt et al.
as 3:2023cv00097
Counter Defendant:
Recovery Works, LLC
Defendant:
Ciara Bobbitt, Sean M. Bobbitt and Best Life E-Therapy LLC
Plaintiff:
Recovery Works Healing Center LLC
Russell v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00953
Plaintiff:
branden d russell and Branden D. Russell
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
v. Russell
as 2:2023cv00949
Defendant:
Branden D Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
v. Russell
as 2:2023oe00949
Defendant:
Branden D. Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Rose v. Centrus Energy Corp. et al
as 2:2023cv00910
Plaintiff:
Christian Rose
Defendant:
Centrus Energy Corp., BWXT Conversion Services, LLC, United States Enrichment Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Hodge v. Family Dollar Services, LLC
as 1:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Shiri Hodge
Defendant:
Family Dollar Services, LLC and John Doe Contractor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Clark v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company et al
as 2:2023cv00882
Plaintiff:
Cathy Clark
Defendant:
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and The Chemours Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Davis, Jr. v. Farrish et al
as 1:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
Theodore W. Davis and Theodore W. Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Craig Farrish and Rolfes Henry CO., L.P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
