Ohio Real Property Cases

Tort Product Liability Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 41 - 50 of 513
Stalling v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02336
Plaintiff: Angela Stalling
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Monte v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02337
Plaintiff: Angela Monte
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Righthouse v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02338
Plaintiff: Pamela Righthouse
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ellcock v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02343
Plaintiff: Barbara Ellcock
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Turnbull v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02340
Plaintiff: Gilana Turnbull
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Willis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02344
Plaintiff: Mark Willis
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marcus v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02342
Plaintiff: Jack Marcus
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McMillen v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02345
Plaintiff: Candice McMillen
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pearson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02346
Plaintiff: Tracy Pearson
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Velez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02331
Plaintiff: Alexander Velez
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?