Ohio Real Property Cases
Cases 181 - 190 of 3,943
Hadaway v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2022cv03463
Plaintiff:
Toni Hadaway
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mitchell v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03459
Plaintiff:
Ronald Mitchell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Palmer v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2022cv03397
Plaintiff:
Melissa Palmer
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McGuire et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01487
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MCGUIRE and DENISE MCGUIRE
Defendant:
EXACTECH, INC, Exactech, Inc. and Exactech US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lucas v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03090
Plaintiff:
Khimberlie Lucas
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rhine v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03096
Plaintiff:
Delana Rhine
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nagy v. Lordstown Construction Recovery, LLC
as 4:2022cv01376
Plaintiff:
Mari Nagy
Defendant:
Lordstown Construction Recovery, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
McDonalds Corporation v. GB One, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv03009
Plaintiff:
McDonalds Corporation
Defendant:
GB One, LLC and GOLDEN BEAR DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Spector v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02964
Plaintiff:
Paul Spector
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tarness v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2022cv02878
Plaintiff:
Wondo Tarness
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
