US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 2,497
Etuk v. USA
as 4:2023cv00430
Petitioner:
Ibanga Etuk
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hamett v. USA
as 4:2023cv00428
Petitioner:
Randy Alan Hamett
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Savage v. State of Oklahoma, The et al
as 4:2023cv00427
Plaintiff:
Marquice Donnell Savage
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, The, Stephen Kunzweiler and Lauren Crudup
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyce v. United States
as 4:2023cv00424
Petitioner:
Jennifer Boyce
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Simpson v. USA
as 4:2023cv00425
Petitioner:
Shawn Alexander Simpson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
White v. Dowling
as 4:2023cv00423
Petitioner:
Steve A White
Respondent:
Janet Dowling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. Sweat
as 4:2023cv00417
Petitioner:
Shayna Lauren Sims
Respondent:
Christe Sweat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. United States Marshals Service
as 4:2023cv00413
Petitioner:
Jesse Michael Wayne Jackson
Respondent:
US Marshals Service and United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Foy v. Drummond et al
as 4:2023cv00407
Petitioner:
Clint Patrick Foy
Respondent:
Gentner Drummond and Steven Kunzweiler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cato v. Bridges
as 4:2023cv00387
Petitioner:
Timothy Shawn Cato
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
