US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 185
Diamond Game Enterprises Inc v. AGS LLC
as 5:2010cv01341
Plaintiff:
Diamond Game Enterprises Inc
Defendant:
AGS LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Arbuckle Adventures LLC v. Arbuckle Mountain Development LLC et al
as 5:2010cv01310
Plaintiff:
Arbuckle Adventures LLC
Defendant:
Arbuckle Mountain Development LLC and Victor E Garrett
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Citadel Broadcasting Company v. Renda Broadcasting Corporation
as 5:2010cv01253
Plaintiff:
Citadel Broadcasting Company
Defendant:
Renda Broadcasting Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Leachco Inc v. Jeffco Fibres Inc
as 5:2010cv01200
Plaintiff:
Leachco Inc
Defendant:
Jeffco Fibres Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Chevron Intellectual Property LLC et al v. Stop-N-Go Inc et al
as 5:2010cv00739
Plaintiff:
Chevron Intellectual Property LLC and Chevron USA Inc
Defendant:
Stop-N-Go Inc and Ken Redford
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
QuiBids LLC v. Doe
as 5:2010cv00639
Plaintiff:
QuiBids LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blue and Gold Sausage Co v. Carlton Foods Corporation
as 5:2010cv00564
Plaintiff:
Blue and Gold Sausage Co
Defendant:
Carlton Foods Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
BST Software LLC v. Gary Johnson Enterprises Inc et al
as 5:2010cv00385
Plaintiff:
BST Software LLC
Defendant:
Gary Johnson Enterprises Inc and Gary D Johnson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Factory Direct v. Anatomic Global Inc
as 5:2010cv00192
Plaintiff:
Factory Direct and Factory Direct
Defendant:
Anatomic Global Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Paycom Payroll LLC v. Epoch.com LLC
as 5:2010cv00066
Plaintiff:
Paycom Payroll LLC
Defendant:
Epoch.com LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
