US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 185
MidFirst Bank v. MidFirst Credit Union
as 5:2009cv01389
Plaintiff:
MidFirst Bank, MidFirst Bank and MidFirst Bank
Defendant:
MidFirst Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Leachco Inc v. Daddy's Design LLC
as 5:2009cv01144
Plaintiff:
Leachco Inc
Defendant:
Daddy's Design LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Morgan Tire & Auto LLC v. Hibdon Autoplex LLC et al
as 5:2009cv01140
Plaintiff:
Morgan Tire & Auto LLC
Defendant:
Hibdon Autoplex LLC, E Ray Hibdon, Leslie Hibdon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Hill v. Torres et al
as 5:2009cv00895
Plaintiff:
Sherri Hill
Defendant:
Maria Julia Lopez Torres and Jeremy Hong
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Wheeldock LLC v. Ruggier
as 5:2009cv00757
Plaintiff:
Wheeldock LLC
Defendant:
Frank Ruggier
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Linda Angel Investments LLC v. Samuel
as 5:2009cv00669
Plaintiff:
Linda Angel Investments LLC
Defendant:
Sandy Samuel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
America's Drive-In Brand Properties LLC et al v. Bright Orange Software Inc
as 5:2009cv00606
Plaintiff:
America's Drive-In Brand Properties LLC and Sonic Industries LLC
Defendant:
Bright Orange Software Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
TracFone Wireless Inc v. Ada et al
as 5:2009cv00603
Plaintiff:
TracFone Wireless Inc
Defendant:
Rolando Ada, Luzvilla Ada, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
MG Novelty Company v. King
as 5:2009cv00129
Plaintiff:
MG Novelty Company and MG Novelty Company
Defendant:
Denise King
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CAO Nguyen Inc v. Saigon-Taipei Inc et al
as 5:2008cv01244
Plaintiff:
CAO Nguyen Inc
Defendant:
Saigon-Taipei Inc and Kim Seng Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
