Oklahoma Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,855
Marsh v. Cheyenne Club of Roland, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00472
Defendant:
Cheyenne Club of Roland, Inc. doing business as Cheyenne Gentlemen's Club and Joel Pierce
Plaintiff:
Vanity Marsh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Van Huss v. Bill's Electric, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Jon Van Huss
Defendant:
Bill's Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
C. v. United Healthcare Insurance Company et al
as 5:2024cv01160
Plaintiff:
M. C.
Defendant:
United Healthcare Insurance Company and United Behavioral Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Crowley v. FPI Management et al
as 4:2024cv00544
Defendant:
FPI Management and Ellen Richards
Plaintiff:
Shanika Crowley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Banks et al v. City of Bartlesville, Oklahoma
as 4:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Thomas F Brink, Brett L Chew, Michael Crabtree and others
Defendant:
City of Bartlesville, Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Frazier v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 4:2024cv00482
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff:
Sallie Frazier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Cook v. Ready Services LLC et al
as 5:2024cv01052
Defendant:
Ready Services LLC and Scotty Morman
Plaintiff:
Kevin Cook
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Cook v. C Ford Electric LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00966
Defendant:
C Ford Electric LLC and Corey D Ford
Plaintiff:
Kevin Cook
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Santos v. Marco Industry Inc.
as 4:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Estephanier Gomez Santos
Defendant:
Marco Industries
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Livesay v. BNSF Railway Co.
as 4:2024cv00422
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Co.
Plaintiff:
Wayne Livesay
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.