Oregon Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 417
X2Y Attenuators, LLC v. Intel Corporation
as 3:2018cv01394
Plaintiff:
X2y Attenuators, LLC
Defendant:
Intel Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Secure Cam LLC v. VTech Communications Inc
as 3:2018cv01391
Plaintiff:
Secure Cam LLC and Secure Cam, LLC.
Defendant:
VTech Communications Inc and VTech Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Schrock et al v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2018cv01264
Plaintiff:
Duane Michael Schrock and Julie Kaye Embry
Defendant:
JR Johnson, Douglas E. Woodcock, State of Oregon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
MCP IP, LLC v. BOWTECH, INC.
as 6:2018cv01086
Defendant:
BOWTECH, INC.
Plaintiff:
MCP IP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
MCP IP, LLC v Bowtech, Inc.
as 6:2018cv01087
Plaintiff:
MCP IP, LLC
Defendant:
Bowtech, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Abe v. Apple, Inc.
as 3:2018cv01067
Plaintiff:
Toshiyasu Abe
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Elite Products and Design, LLC v. PARKABIKEINC.
as 6:2018cv00992
Plaintiff:
Elite Products and Design, LLC
Defendant:
PARKABIKEINC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Burris Company, Inc. v. Garmin International, Inc.
as 6:2018cv00700
Plaintiff:
Burris Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Garmin International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Baxter Auto Parts, Inc. v. Landmark Technology, LLC
as 3:2018cv00629
Plaintiff:
Baxter Auto Parts, Inc.
Defendant:
Landmark Technology, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 102 Invalidity and Nonenforceability of U.S. Patent
Impact Racing, Inc. v. Russell Technologies, LLC d/b/a Pyrotect
as 3:2018cv00445
Plaintiff:
Impact Racing, Inc.
Defendant:
Russell Technologies, LLC d/b/a Pyrotect
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
