Oregon Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 572
McGill v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 6:2021cv00990
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Ann McGill
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Kia America, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00936
Plaintiff:
Willie Banks
Defendant:
Kia America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rathjen v. Amazon.com Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00850
Defendant:
Richmond Valley Limited and Amazon.com Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kari Rathjen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv00706
Plaintiff:
Cheyenne Carter
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Le v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00635
Defendant:
Teva Womens Health, LLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., The Cooper Companies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Thien Thanh Le
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zamudio-Leon v. Doterra International, LLC
as 6:2021cv00495
Plaintiff:
Maria Zamudio-Leon
Defendant:
Doterra International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lowell v. Future Motion, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00470
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lowell
Defendant:
Covewater Paddle Surf, Inc. and Future Motion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hampton v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv00341
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hampton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barron et al v. Extreme Products Group, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00227
Plaintiff:
Brett Kelly Barron and Emily Barron
Defendant:
New Big 5 Corp., Extreme Products Group, LLC and Big 5 Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hobus v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 3:2021cv00080
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Stryker Corporation and Stryker Biotech LLC
Plaintiff:
Jacob Hobus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
