US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Contract Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 167
GODDARD SYSTEMS, INC. v. ROBERTSON et al
as 2:2012cv02769
Plaintiff:
GODDARD SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant:
THEODORE A. ROBERTSON, AMY F. MCMAHON, SHARONDA A. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GODDARD SYSTEMS, INC. v. FATATO et al
as 2:2012cv02406
Plaintiff:
GODDARD SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant:
GLORIA FATATO, APRIL FATATO, THOMAS FATATO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MR. SANDLESS FRANCHISE, LLC v. GUNNESON et al
as 2:2012cv02242
Plaintiff:
MR. SANDLESS FRANCHISE, LLC
Defendant:
WILLIAM GUNNESON, VALLEY UMBRELLA, INC. and GUNNESON ENTERPRISES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, INC. v. SINGH
as 2:2012cv02209
Plaintiff:
AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, INC.
Defendant:
PAVAMVIR SINGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC. v. KASTNER, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv01870
Plaintiff:
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC.
Defendant:
KASTNER, INC., WILLIAM J. KASTNER and BARBARA A. KASTNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SOFT PRETZEL FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC. v. QUIGLEY CAPITAL, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00953
Plaintiff:
SOFT PRETZEL FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC. and AN ORIGINAL SOFT PRETZEL FACTORY, INC.
Defendant:
QUIGLEY CAPITAL, LLC, VINCENT G. QUIGLEY, JR. and GINA SOLDO QUIGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC. v. PEREDOS, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00872
Plaintiff:
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC.
Defendant:
PEREDOS, LLC, JAYSON A. PEREDO, JESSICA V. PEREDO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
7-ELEVEN, INC. v. ALBARQAWI
as 2:2012cv00207
Plaintiff:
7-ELEVEN, INC.
Defendant:
BAHER ALBARQAWI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
7-ELEVEN, INC. v. BAIG
as 2:2011cv07287
Plaintiff:
7-ELEVEN, INC.
Defendant:
TANWEER BAIG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, INC. v. STEVEN
as 2:2011cv07001
Plaintiff:
AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, INC.
Defendant:
MICHAEL E. STEVEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
