US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,327
Stoltzfus v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv03294
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
Ms. Joann Stoltzfus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SINCLAIR v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv03150
Plaintiff:
PETER MICHAEL SINCLAIR
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
CHAU v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv03092
Plaintiff:
KHANG AN CHAU
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
DE JESUS RODRIGUEZ v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv02983
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Plaintiff:
IVETTE DE JESUS RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
IN RE: DAYO G. WALLACE, ET. AL.
as 2:2024cv02950
Plaintiff:
DAYO G. WALLACE and JEROME WALLACE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WALLACE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv02976
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
DAYO G. WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
RIVERA v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2024cv02923
Plaintiff:
JESSENIA RIVERA
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
CRUZ v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2024cv02688
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CRUZ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
MOUZON v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv02664
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA DIASHIA MOUZON
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BETHEA v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv02580
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE BETHEA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
