US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 805
PATTERSON v. OCUGEN, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01500
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN PATTERSON
Defendant:
OCUGEN, INC., SHANKAR MUSUNURI, SANJAY SUBRAMANIAN and others
BFF II PTE. LTD. et al v. ROSEN et al
as 2:2024cv01228
Plaintiff:
BFF II PTE. LTD. and SIDE DOOR VENTURES, LP
Defendant:
MATTHEW ROSEN and BLAIR JESSE REICH
WU v. BARASCH et al
as 2:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
WEIDING WU
Defendant:
RICHARD BARASCH, LUKE MCGEE, STEPHEN P. GRIGGS and others
SKOLNICK v. EVOLUTION AB (publ) et al
as 2:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
RACHEL SKOLNICK
Defendant:
EVOLUTION AB (publ), Marin Carleslund, Jacob Kaplan and others
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2023cv04889
Plaintiff:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
VERNON WILLIAMS and JUDITH WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Notice of Removal: Securities Fraud
OKLAHOMA FIREFIGHTERS PENSION AND RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. FMC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2023cv04842
Plaintiff:
OKLAHOMA FIREFIGHTERS PENSION AND RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Defendant:
FMC CORPORATION, MARK A. DOUGLAS and ANDREW D. SANDIFER
PETRY v. COINME, INC.
as 2:2023cv04664
Plaintiff:
KENT PETRY
Defendant:
COINME, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1131 Violation of Lanham Act and Unfair Competition
EMPLOYER-TEAMSTERS LOCAL NOS. 175 & 505 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND v. FMC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2023cv04487
Plaintiff:
EMPLOYER-TEAMSTERS LOCAL NOS. 175 & 505 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND
Defendant:
FMC CORPORATION, MARK A DOUGLAS and ANDREW D SANDIFER
HEEG v. FMC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2023cv04398
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. HEEG
Defendant:
FMC CORPORATION, MARK A. DOUGLAS and ANDREW D. SANDIFER
ALLEGHENY COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, v. ADAPTHEALTH CORP. et al
as 2:2023cv04104
Plaintiff:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM,
Defendant:
ADAPTHEALTH CORP., LUKE MCGEE, Joshua Parnes and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
