US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 217,195
Baucom et al v. Torres Vidal
as 2:2024cv01818
Plaintiff:
Shelley L Baucom and Joseph Baucom
Defendant:
Samira M Torres Vidal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
HARMON v. ATLAS FLASHER & SUPPLY CO, INC
as 2:2024cv01830
Plaintiff:
AARON HARMON
Defendant:
ATLAS FLASHER & SUPPLY CO, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
BRATCHER v. SMITH et al
as 2:2024cv01811
Plaintiff:
AJAMU BRATCHER
Defendant:
JEFFREY SMITH and D & F TRAVEL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
CAMPEA v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv01814
Plaintiff:
CASSANDRA CAMPEA
Defendant:
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MORGAN v. GU YEA
as 2:2024cv01823
Plaintiff:
AMANDA MORGAN
Defendant:
SUNG GU YEA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
PETROGIANNIS
as 2:2024cv01795
Plaintiff:
MARIA PETROGIANNIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
PATEL v. ANOOPAM MISSION, INC.
as 2:2024cv01808
Plaintiff:
GARIMA PATEL
Defendant:
ANOOPAM MISSION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PATEL v. ANOOPAM MISSION, INC.
as 5:2024cv01808
Plaintiff:
GARIMA PATEL
Defendant:
ANOOPAM MISSION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
KELLEY v. NOVO NORDISK INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01793
Plaintiff:
ROBYN KELLEY
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC., NOVO NORDISK US COMMERCIAL HOLDINGS, INC., NOVO NORDISK US HOLDINGS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lisenby v. OLYMPUS CORPORATION OF THE AMERICAS et al
as 5:2024cv01803
Plaintiff:
Paul Lisenby
Defendant:
OLYMPUS CORPORATION OF THE AMERICAS, OLYMPUS AMERICA INC. and GYRUS ACMI, INC.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
