US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,579
Aparicio et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2024cv01246
Plaintiff:
Ariatna Ochoa Aparicio and Anabel Ochoa Aparicio
Defendant:
Ur Mendoza Jaddou and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gusley v. Central Penn Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01231
Plaintiff:
Dustin Gusley
Defendant:
Ambassador Home Improvements, Inc. doing business as Renewal by Andersen of Central PA and Central Penn Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Jackson v. Intel Media House Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01181
Defendant:
Intel Media House Inc. and eHealth Insurance Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gerard Jackson
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Tufano v. TikTok Inc.
as 3:2024cv01116
Defendant:
TikTok Inc.
Plaintiff:
Frank Tufano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
