Pennsylvania Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 6,488
ARNETT v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04574
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
ARNETT JOHN ARNETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PERKINS v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 2:2024cv04581
Plaintiff:
KELLY PERKINS
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MARTIN v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv04586
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
DAVID MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MARCHESE v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04587
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
PAUL MARCHESE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GONZALES v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04588
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
GONZALES LINDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BYRD v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04589
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
FIDENCIA BYRD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WRIGHT v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04592
Plaintiff:
BRYAN WRIGHT
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LAWSON v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04518
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
GERTRUDE LAWSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOUSTON v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 2:2024cv04520
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HOUSTON
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ARGUS v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04521
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
DONNA MARIE ARGUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
