US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 750
Jarmon, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv01264
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Leon Jarmon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Herron v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2024cv02843
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
Robert L Herron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Adams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv02838
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Judy Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Spinks v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv02805
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Lisa Shunda Spinks
Unknown:
General Counsel SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01214
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Jones
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Ervin v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01208
Plaintiff:
Tabitha Ervin
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Arthur v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01207
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Gary Arthur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Morris v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
Larry Morris
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Mondie v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv02647
Plaintiff:
Janice M. Mondie
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rollins v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01180
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Willie Ray Rollins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
