US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Labor Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 1,582
Mercer v. SSRG II, LLC
as 2:2023cv02082
Plaintiff:
Hattie Mercer
Defendant:
SSRG II, LLC doing business as Chicken Salad Chick
U.A. 614 Health & Welfare Fund et al v. Wooten Mechanical, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02071
Plaintiff:
U.A. 614 Health & Welfare Fund, U.A. 614 Pension Fund and U.A. 614 Improvement Trust Fund
Defendant:
Wooten Mechanical, LLC and Anthony Wooten
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
U.A. 614 Health & Welfare Fund et al v. Roy Blackwell Enterprises, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02069
Plaintiff:
U.A. 614 Health & Welfare Fund, U.A 614 Pension Fund and U.A. 614 Improvement Trust Fund
Defendant:
Roy Blackwell Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
National Labor Relations Board v. Young
as 2:2023cv02051
Plaintiff:
National Labor Relations Board
Defendant:
Tomica Young
Slater v. Veryable, LLC
as 2:2023cv02040
Plaintiff:
Antonio Slater
Defendant:
Veryable, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Durham v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv02021
Plaintiff:
Ronald Durham
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Fowler v. Woodridge of West Tennessee, LLC
as 1:2023cv01005
Plaintiff:
Daniel Fowler and Daniel Fain Fowler
Defendant:
Woodridge of West Tennessee, LLC and Woodridge of West Tennessee, LLC doing business as Perimeter Behavioral of Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams v. Innovative Employee Solutions, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02015
Plaintiff:
Tyischa Williams
Defendant:
Innovative Employee Solutions, Inc.
Prescott v. Estes Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02002
Plaintiff:
Don Prescott
Defendant:
Estes Holdings, LLC, Ronald Craig Estes and Christy Estes
Slater v. Cart.Com, Inc et al
as 2:2022cv02872
Plaintiff:
Antonio Slater
Defendant:
Cart.Com, Inc and FB Flurry, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
