US District Court for the Northern District of Texas Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 171 - 180 of 1,551
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 3:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 3:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC and Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 3:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC and Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 3:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 3:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Banilla Games, Inc. et al v. McCarthy et al
as 3:2022cv02910
Plaintiff:
Banilla Games, Inc., Grover Gaming, Inc., Banilla Games Inc and others
Defendant:
Cameron McCarthy, Seth Agli and Kacey Morgan
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 3:2022cv02864
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC and Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2022cv02856
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC and Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 3:2022cv02859
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC and Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 3:2022cv02863
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC and Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
