US District Court for the Northern District of Texas Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 197
Horton v. Multiplan Inc
as 3:2023cv02098
Plaintiff:
Lucas Horton
Defendant:
Multiplan Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Leichtle v. Advantex Asset Management
as 3:2023cv02062
Plaintiff:
Julie Leichtle
Defendant:
Advantex Asset Management
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hunsinger v. Atmos Energy Corporation
as 3:2023cv02009
Plaintiff:
Joe Hunsinger
Defendant:
Atmos Energy Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Tarpley v. American Finance Inc
as 3:2023cv01962
Plaintiff:
Antonia Tarpley
Defendant:
American Finance Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Kirkland v. JD ByRider DFW Texas Inc
as 3:2023cv01939
Plaintiff:
Devyn Kirkland
Defendant:
JD ByRider DFW-Texas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Vinson v. Meghani World Inc
as 3:2023cv01938
Plaintiff:
marquelle vinson
Defendant:
Meghani world inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hopson
as 3:2023xc01924
Petitioner:
Attorney Raymond Hopson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Reynolds v. R1 RCM Inc
as 2:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
Raymond L Reynolds
Defendant:
R1 RCM Inc doing business as Medical Financial Solutions
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Morris v. Charter Communications, Inc
as 3:2023cv01741
Plaintiff:
George Morris
Defendant:
Charter Communications, Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hargrove v. Jackson Automotive Investments LLC
as 3:2023cv01736
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Hargrove
Defendant:
Jackson Automotive Investments LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
