US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Contract Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 7,137
Pous v. CPR Classic Sales
as 4:2024cv02658
Defendant:
CPR CLASSIC SALES
Plaintiff:
GUILLERMO POUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv02639
Defendant:
Mr. William M Hickman, II
Plaintiff:
Frost Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
DKSH Canada Corp. v. MGF US, Inc
as 4:2024cv02629
Defendant:
MGF US, Inc
Plaintiff:
DKSH Canada Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Hancock Whitney Bank v. JCM Trucking, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv02635
Defendant:
Diniata Anderson, Dwayne Burleson and JCM Trucking, LLC
Plaintiff:
Hancock Whitney Bank
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Zap Auto Export Co., Ltd v. Red Sun Racing, LLC
as 4:2024cv02601
Defendant:
Red Sun Racing, LLC
Plaintiff:
Zap Auto Export Co., Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Sullivan Environmental Services, Inc. et al v. Greenberg, Grant & Richards, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00210
Defendant:
Greenberg, Grant & Richards, Inc. and Learjet, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sullivan Environmental Services, Inc. and Sierra Bravo LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Rios et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 7:2024cv00276
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jorge Rios, Jr. and Benita Rios
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Martinez v. Kia America, Inc.
as 4:2024cv02558
Defendant:
Kia America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
THEODORE MARTINEZ, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Ratcliffe v. Equifax Inc.
as 4:2024cv02555
Defendant:
Equifax Inc.
Plaintiff:
Patricia C. Ratcliffe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Latam v. Bryan
as 6:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Nora Latam
Defendant:
Tracy J Bryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
