US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 76,766
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Harrys Daiquiris LLC et al
as 4:2024cv01382
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Harrys Daiquiris LLC d/b/a Harry's Daiquiri, d/b/a Harry's Daiquiris, and d/b/a Harry's Daiquiries, Amit Gupta and Vinod Gupta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. The CYP Ranch LLC et al
as 4:2024cv01354
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
The CYP Ranch LLC d/b/a The Ranch Bar + Kitchen, Martha Ethridge and James Womac
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Laccinole v. Secure One Financial, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01336
Plaintiff:
Christopher Laccinole
Defendant:
Secure One Financial, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Burdogz LLC et al
as 6:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Burdogz LLC d/b/a Burdogz and d/b/a Burdogz Bar and Grill, Jennifer K. Moya and Russell C. Moya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
