US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Torts - Property Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 671
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv02968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Adeyinka v. May et al
as 4:2022cv02216
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Adeyinka
Defendant:
Sarah May, Harris County Courts and Micheal May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Adeyinka v. Armstrong et al
as 4:2022cv02219
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Adeyinka
Defendant:
Armstrong, Brady Barrs, C. Aquilera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2022cv02022
Plaintiff:
Coco Luo
Defendant:
Coinbase, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Taube v. Baumann
as 4:2022cv01604
Plaintiff:
Justina P Taube
Defendant:
Riecke Baumann
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114 Motion for Return of Seized Property
Hardman v. Bank Of America
as 4:2022cv01537
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hardman
Defendant:
Bank Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Landers v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 4:2022cv01463
Counter Defendant:
Kim O. Landers
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
3Rd Party Defendant:
OMNIBUS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Curtis v. Brunsting et al
as 4:2022cv01129
Plaintiff:
Candace Louise Curtis
Defendant:
Anita Kay Brunsting
Counter Claimant:
Amy Ruth Brunsting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Crosswell et al v. Rodriguez et al
as 4:2022cv01105
Plaintiff:
Jorge Crosswell, Gloria Wang, LA Trade Supplies, LLC and others
Defendant:
Juan Carlos Martinez Cecias Rodriguez, Karina Hernandez, Cecilia Miranda and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
