US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Labor Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 690
Garrett v. Hooters of America, LLC
as 4:2021cv00154
Defendant:
Hooters of America, LLC
Plaintiff:
Shara Garrett
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104
Flores et al v. ACCC General Agency, Inc. ACCC Insurance Company
as 4:2021cv00027
Plaintiff:
Carlos Leonardo Delcid, Melanie Whitcomb, Todd Schaffer and others
Defendant:
ACCC General Agency, Inc. D/B/A ACCC Insurance Company and ACCC General Agency,Inc. doing business as ACCC Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104
Ward v. UPI Builders, LLC
as 4:2020cv04342
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Ward
Defendant:
UPI Builders, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Van Brummen v. Hess Corporation
as 4:2020cv04330
Defendant:
Hess Corporation
Plaintiff:
Christopher Van Brummen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Hardin v. United Airlines Inc
as 4:2020cv03893
Defendant:
United Airlines Inc
Plaintiff:
Christina R Hardin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Henderson, Jr. v. Safety Vision, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv03789
Defendant:
Safety Vision, LLC and Bruce H. Smith
Plaintiff:
James Henderson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Lisi v. Ahern, Inc.
as 4:2020cv03790
Plaintiff:
Kevin S Lisi
Defendant:
Ahern, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris-Shea Bridge Company, Inc. v. Cajun Industries, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00342
Defendant:
John Mobley, Daniel Caudle, Cajun Industries, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Morris-SheBridge Company, Inc. and Morris-Shea Bridge Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mills v. Reladyne West, LLC
as 4:2020cv03758
Plaintiff:
Jerime Mills
Defendant:
Reladyne West, LLC and Reladyne, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garza v. Harlingen Medical Center, L.P.
as 1:2020cv00152
Plaintiff:
Maria D. Garza
Defendant:
Harlingen Medical Center, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
