US District Court for the Western District of Texas Contract Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,845
Hasdorff et al v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 5:2025cv00048
Plaintiff:
John A. Convery and Julie Hasdorff
Defendant:
Navy Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Winnick v. ProFrac Holdings II, LLC
as 1:2025cv00033
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Winnick
Defendant:
ProFrac Holdings II, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
v. American Fire Wire, Inc.
as 1:2025cv00035
Defendant:
American Fire Wire, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1441 (a) Breach of Contract
WIR Systems, Inc v. Neumann Realty Corp. et al
as 1:2025cv00009
Defendant:
Chad Neumann and Neumann Realty Corp.
Plaintiff:
WIR Systems, Inc doing business as Watters International Realty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Breach of Contract
Patel et al v. Qatar Airway Group Q.C.S.C.
as 1:2024cv01599
Plaintiff:
Jalpa Patel and Kirtan Patel
Defendant:
Qatar Airway Group Q.C.S.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Barrientos et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2024cv01591
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Barrientos and Richard Barrientos
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Ponce v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2024cv01592
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Plaintiff:
Raymond Ponce
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Alvarado v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2024cv01593
Plaintiff:
Danny Alvarado
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Mango Eleven, LLC v. Bharwani et al
as 5:2024cv01477
Defendant:
Derek W Guillory, Suliman Bharwani, Derek W. Guillory, M.D., PA and others
Plaintiff:
Mango Eleven, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
King v. Hellas Construction, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01585
Defendant:
Hellas Construction, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Mark King
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 207 Maximum Hours
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
