Texas Labor Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 146
Acevedo v. United States Railroad Retirement Board et al
as 1:2018cv00052
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Acevedo
Defendant:
United States Railroad Retirement Board and Union Pacific Railroad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Acosta v. BNSF Railway Company
as 3:2018cv00068
Plaintiff:
Anastacio Acosta
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Summerlin v. Barrow
as 4:2017cv01016
Defendant:
Robert W Barrow
Plaintiff:
Dale H Summerlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Acevedo v. United States Railroad Retirement Board et al
as 1:2017cv00216
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Acevedo
Defendant:
United States Railroad Retirement Board , Walter A Barrows , Steven J Anthony and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
French v. New Hampshire Insurance Company et al
as 3:2017cv02612
Plaintiff:
Michael J French
Defendant:
New Hampshire Insurance Company and American Airlines Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carter v. Local 556, Transport Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO
as 3:2017cv02277
Plaintiff:
Charlene Carter
Defendant:
Local 556, Transport Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carter v. Transport Workers Union of America Local 556
as 3:2017cv02278
Plaintiff:
Charlene Carter
Defendant:
Transport Workers Union of America Local 556 and Southwest Airlines Co
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Johnson v. Union Pacific Railroad
as 4:2017cv00630
Plaintiff:
Rodney Johnson
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hand v. Southwest Airlines Co
as 3:2017cv01164
Plaintiff:
Kent Hand
Defendant:
Southwest Airlines Co
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Aircraft Mechanics Fraternal Association v. Southwest Airlines Company
as 3:2017cv01052
Plaintiff:
Aircraft Mechanics Fraternal Association
Defendant:
Southwest Airlines Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
