Utah Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 790
RSB Spine v. Innovasis
as 2:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
RSB Spine
Defendant:
Innovasis
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0145 Patent Infringement
Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals et al v. Vintage Muscle
as 2:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals and Intellectual Wellness
Defendant:
Vintage Muscle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
CAO Group Inc v. Walmart Inc.
as 2:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
CAO Group Inc
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
EK Ekcessories v. National Industries for the Blind
as 2:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
EK Ekcessories
Defendant:
for the Blind National Industries
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
EK Ekcessories v. National Industries for the Blind
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
EK Ekcessories
Defendant:
National Industries for the Blind
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
HuxWrx Safety Co v. SilencerCo
as 2:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
HuxWrk Safety Co
Defendant:
SilencerCo
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Xidrone Systems v. Fortem Technologies
as 2:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Xidrone Systems
Defendant:
Fortem Technologies
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al v. Aylo Freesites Ltd et al
as 2:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
DISH Technologies L.L.C. and Sling TV L.L.C.
Defendant:
Aylo Freesites Ltd and 9219-1568 Quebec Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Lashify, Inc. v. Pro Lash, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Lashify, Inc.
Defendant:
Pro Lash, Inc., Bella Lash Extensions LLC d/b/a Pro Lash, Zachary Chipman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Axcess Global Sciences v. Mckim
as 2:2023cv00937
Plaintiff:
Axcess Global Sciences
Defendant:
Randall Mckim an individual doing business as Natural Pure doing business as Vitalpureorganics
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
