U.S. District Court for the District of Vermont Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 802
Burke v. Deml
as 2:2025cv00587
Petitioner:
James T. Burke
Respondent:
Nick Deml
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butler v. Deml
as 2:2025cv00465
Petitioner:
Brian Butler
Respondent:
Nicholas Deml
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kolts v. State of Vermont
as 2:2025cv00434
Petitioner:
Rein Kolts
Respondent:
State of Vermont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ozturk v. Hyde et al
as 2:2025cv00374
Petitioner:
Rumeysa Ozturk
Respondent:
Patricia Hyde, Michael Krol, Todd Lyons and others
Amicus Curiae:
Brett F Stokes and The Cato Institute
Witne:
Becky Penberthy
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1182 Defend. Denial of Pla. Appl. for Alien Employment Cer
Woods v. Clark et al
as 2:2025cv00369
Plaintiff:
George Woods and George Everett Woods
Defendant:
Charity Clark, Robert Menzel, David Groff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Sprafke
as 2:2025cv00307
Plaintiff:
Dana B. Martin
Defendant:
Jennifer Sprafke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Welch v. State of Vermont
as 2:2025cv00025
Petitioner:
Richard Paul Welch, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Vermont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
