US District Court for the District of Vermont Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 664
Efthimiatos v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv00043
Petitioner:
Angelo Peter Efthimiatos
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Many v. Vermont Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv00042
Defendant:
Centurion Health Care, Vermont Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Joshua Many
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Holder v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv00028
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Ramell Holder
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate Sentence
Flower v. United States of America
as 5:2019cv00002
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Sherry L. Flower
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate Sentence
Crawford v. United States of America
as 5:2019cv00001
Plaintiff:
Antonio D. Crawford
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Alcalay v. United States of America
as 2:2018cv00227
Petitioner:
David Alcalay
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate Sentence
Carpentino v. Lyons
as 5:2018cv00207
Defendant:
Mike Lyons, VT Southern State Correctional Facility, Superintendent
Plaintiff:
Kurt Carpentino
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Cameron v. Menard et al
as 5:2018cv00204
Defendant:
Mark Potanas, Lisa Menard, Joshua Rutherford
Plaintiff:
David Cammie Cameron
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Darling v. United States of America
as 2:2018cv00193
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Darling
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate Sentence
Bartshe v. Menard et al
as 2:2018cv00166
Defendant:
Marble Valley Regional Correctional Facility, Dr. Fischer, MD, Tom Giffin
and others
Plaintiff:
James Bartshe
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
