U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,543
Chiu v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2025cv00962
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Chiu
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Fields v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2025cv00966
Plaintiff:
Patrick H Fields
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Stafford v. Dudek
as 3:2025cv05439
Plaintiff:
Jim Stafford
Defendant:
Leland Dudek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Maher v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2025cv05423
Plaintiff:
David Maher
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2025cv05408
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Beeney v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2025cv05411
Plaintiff:
Denise M Beeney
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Maidhoff v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2025cv05413
Plaintiff:
Jessica Lynn Maidhoff
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Selfridge v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2025cv05403
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Selfridge
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Weldon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2025cv00853
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lawrence Weldon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Pringle v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2025cv00852
Plaintiff:
Garth Gabrial Pringle
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
