Washington Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 949
Recinos v. State of Washington
as 3:2023cv06060
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Recinos
Defendant:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Olson Kundig Inc v Apollo Design Studio LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01792
Plaintiff:
Olson Kundig, Inc.
Defendant:
Apollo Design Studio, LLC, Paul Schlachter and Christelle Coetzee
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Neymour v. JINFGA Beauy Store et al
as 2:2023cv01799
Defendant:
L7 Mannequin Weiweiliu, JINFGA Beauy Store, Shaoke Jiang and others
Plaintiff:
Shaneka Neymour
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Koudis v. AtmosFX Inc
as 2:2023cv01694
Plaintiff:
Nick Koudis
Defendant:
AtmosFX Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Reynolds v. Huong Mai
as 2:2023cv01688
Plaintiff:
Shannon T Reynolds
Defendant:
Nghiem Thi Huong Mai
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
Baylis v. Valve Corporation
as 2:2023cv01653
Defendant:
Valve Corporation and Valve Software
Plaintiff:
Trevor Kevin Baylis
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Shi v. Zhu
as 2:2023cv01401
Plaintiff:
Xinliang Shi
Defendant:
Jun Bin Zhu doing business as ruianshidonglaiguojimaoyiyouxiangongsi
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Sergeevich v. Denisovich
as 2:2023cv01331
Plaintiff:
Artem Beresnev Sergeevich
Defendant:
Nekrasov Rostislav Denisovich
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Bee Creek Photography v. Cascadia Capital LLC
as 2:2023cv01220
Plaintiff:
Bee Creek Photography
Defendant:
Cascadia Capital LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Signatours Corporation v. Hauer et al
as 2:2023cv01204
Plaintiff:
Signatours Corporation
Defendant:
Chad Hauer, Hauer Stephanie and Stephanie Hauer
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
