US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin Social Security Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 1,223
Billingslea v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00534
Plaintiff:
Alexis Billingslea
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Meier v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00483
Plaintiff:
Eric Meier
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rodriguez v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 2:2022cv00471
Plaintiff:
Deborah Rodriguez
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Kramer v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 2:2022cv00442
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Michael Kramer
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rusboldt v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00349
Plaintiff:
Andree Rusboldt
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wichman v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00345
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wichman
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
King v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 2:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
Barry H King
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Kruse v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00310
Plaintiff:
Karly E Kruse
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Seeley v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 2:2022cv00272
Plaintiff:
Micaine A Seeley
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Meyer v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00259
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Meyer
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
