US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin Real Property Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 236
Magett v. HUD
as 2:2022cv00808
Plaintiff:
Aquanetta Magett
Defendant:
HUD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Biel v. City of Beaver Dam
as 2:2022cv00766
Plaintiff:
John Myron Biel
Defendant:
City of Beaver Dam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cannon v. Racine County et al
as 2:2022cv00655
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dentelle Cannon
Defendant:
John P Serketich, Eugene A Gasiorkiewicz, State of Wisconsin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
William K Langfan Revocable Trust v. Foot Locker Specialty Inc
as 2:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
William K Langfan Revocable Trust
Defendant:
Foot Locker Inc and Foot Locker Specialty Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Vogt v. Vogt et al
as 2:2021cv01452
Plaintiff:
Donna Marie Vogt
Defendant:
Donald H Vogt, Chase & Co, Amy Donaldson and others
NexGen Coastal Investments LLC v. Bledsoe et al
as 2:2021cv01216
Plaintiff:
NexGen Coastal Investments, LLC and NexGen Coastal Investments LLC
Defendant:
Sharon A. Bledsoe, Franklin Financial Corporation, Ford Motor Credit Company a/k/a Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Willut v. Heuer
as 2:2021cv01147
Plaintiff:
Ronald James Willut
Defendant:
Nita Marie Heuer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Basso Builders Inc et al v. Town of Geneva
as 2:2021cv00697
Plaintiff:
Basso Builders Inc and Josh Basso
Defendant:
Town of Geneva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Babcock v. Town of Sugar Creek et al
as 2:2021cv00691
Plaintiff:
Karen A Babcock
Defendant:
Amy M Odette, Michael K Nelson, Mary Beth Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monroe v. Klajbor et al
as 2:2021cv00593
Defendant:
DWD Wisconsin and James F Klajbor
Plaintiff:
Richard L Monroe
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
