Holland v. MGA, Inc. et al

Holland v. MGA, Inc. et al

Case Number:	1:2005cv00237
Filed:	March 14, 2005
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office:	Dothan Office
Presiding Judge:	Vanzetta P. McPherson
Presiding Judge:	William Keith Watkins
Nature of Suit:	Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Cause of Action:	18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 4, 2018	Filing 129 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1) Barbara Holland's 117 motion for relief from judgment is GRANTED; 2) The 109 Order is VACATED IN PART on grounds that it is VOID IN PART. Specifically, the 109 Order is vacated as void to the extent that the Order enters judgment against Barbara Holland and/or "Barbara Holland d/b/a Choice Video" and in favor of LFP, Inc., in the amount of $1,917.03, in favor of Movie Gallery US, LLC, in the amount of $ 5,614.00, and in favor of Mile High Media, Inc., in the amount of $2,337.00; 3) The 109 judgment remains valid and shall continue in force solely against Malcolm Rance Newman ("Malcolm R. Newman, Esq."), as further set out in order; 4) As to Barbara Holland and/or "Barbara Holland d/b/a Choice Video", Dfts shall make no further attempts to execute on the judgment, as further set out in order; 5) Barbara Holland may request the Clerk of the Court to issue an Amended Cer tificate of Judgment reflecting that the 109 judgment (1) has been vacated in part and is void as to Barbara Holland and/or "Barbara Holland d/b/a Choice Video", (2) that neither Barbara Holland nor "Barbara Holland d/b/a Choice Vide o" is liable to any Dft, including Dfts LFP, Inc., Movie Gallery US, LLC, Mile High Media, Inc., for any amount with respect to the judgment in this case, and (3) that the 109 judgment continues and remains valid solely against Malcolm Rance N ewman ("Malcolm R. Newman, Esq.") and in favor of LFP, Inc., in the amount of $1,917.03, in favor of Movie Gallery US, LLC, in the amount of $5,614.00, and in favor of Mile High Media, Inc., in the amount of $2,337.00; 6) DIR ECTING the Clerk to serve a copy of this order on the following persons at the following addresses by certified mail, return receipt requested, as further set out in order; Copies mailed by CMRRR a directed. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 1/3/2018. (alm, )
December 15, 2017	Filing 126 ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1) Marla Y. Newman's 112 & 114 motions to vacate the judgment against Malcolm RanceNewman are DENIED; 2) Dft LFP, Inc.'s 115 motion to revive the judgment is DENIED IN PART as to the judgment agains t Barbara Holland. As to the judgment against Malcolm Rance Newman, the court will reserve ruling on the motion until 1/5/2018, to allow Dft LFP, Inc., an opportunity to perfect service in accordance with the applicable rules of procedure; 3) On or b efore 1/5/2018, Dft LFP, Inc., shall file either (1) proof of proper service on Malcolm Rance Newman of the 115 motion to revive the judgment, or (2) a notice briefly describing its unsuccessful service attempts and stating whether it wishes to pro ceed with the motion to revive judgment as to Malcolm Rance Newman; 4) On or before 1/5/2018, Barbara Holland or any Dft may file a well-supported motion for all attorneys' fees and costs incurred as a result of this case, except for the costs a nd attorneys' fees incurred in litigating appeals, as further set out in order; 5) Malcolm Rance Newman may respond to any motion for attorney's fees not later than 14 days after being served with that motion; 6) On or before 12/22/2017, Ba rbara Holland shall (1) file and serve a proposed order granting her motion for relief from judgment; and (2) submit a copy of the proposed order, in Microsoft Word11 or Wordperfect format, to the following email address: propord_watkins@almd.uscourts.gov; DIRECTING the Clerk to serve a copy of this order on the following persons, as further set out in order; Copies mailed by CMRRR as directed. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 12/15/2017. (alm, )

Date Filed

Document Text

January 4, 2018

Filing 129 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1) Barbara Holland's 117 motion for relief from judgment is GRANTED; 2) The 109 Order is VACATED IN PART on grounds that it is VOID IN PART. Specifically, the 109 Order is vacated as void to the extent that the Order enters judgment against Barbara Holland and/or "Barbara Holland d/b/a Choice Video" and in favor of LFP, Inc., in the amount of $1,917.03, in favor of Movie Gallery US, LLC, in the amount of $ 5,614.00, and in favor of Mile High Media, Inc., in the amount of $2,337.00; 3) The 109 judgment remains valid and shall continue in force solely against Malcolm Rance Newman ("Malcolm R. Newman, Esq."), as further set out in order; 4) As to Barbara Holland and/or "Barbara Holland d/b/a Choice Video", Dfts shall make no further attempts to execute on the judgment, as further set out in order; 5) Barbara Holland may request the Clerk of the Court to issue an Amended Cer tificate of Judgment reflecting that the 109 judgment (1) has been vacated in part and is void as to Barbara Holland and/or "Barbara Holland d/b/a Choice Video", (2) that neither Barbara Holland nor "Barbara Holland d/b/a Choice Vide o" is liable to any Dft, including Dfts LFP, Inc., Movie Gallery US, LLC, Mile High Media, Inc., for any amount with respect to the judgment in this case, and (3) that the 109 judgment continues and remains valid solely against Malcolm Rance N ewman ("Malcolm R. Newman, Esq.") and in favor of LFP, Inc., in the amount of $1,917.03, in favor of Movie Gallery US, LLC, in the amount of $5,614.00, and in favor of Mile High Media, Inc., in the amount of $2,337.00; 6) DIR ECTING the Clerk to serve a copy of this order on the following persons at the following addresses by certified mail, return receipt requested, as further set out in order; Copies mailed by CMRRR a directed. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 1/3/2018. (alm, )

December 15, 2017

Filing 126 ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1) Marla Y. Newman's 112 & 114 motions to vacate the judgment against Malcolm RanceNewman are DENIED; 2) Dft LFP, Inc.'s 115 motion to revive the judgment is DENIED IN PART as to the judgment agains t Barbara Holland. As to the judgment against Malcolm Rance Newman, the court will reserve ruling on the motion until 1/5/2018, to allow Dft LFP, Inc., an opportunity to perfect service in accordance with the applicable rules of procedure; 3) On or b efore 1/5/2018, Dft LFP, Inc., shall file either (1) proof of proper service on Malcolm Rance Newman of the 115 motion to revive the judgment, or (2) a notice briefly describing its unsuccessful service attempts and stating whether it wishes to pro ceed with the motion to revive judgment as to Malcolm Rance Newman; 4) On or before 1/5/2018, Barbara Holland or any Dft may file a well-supported motion for all attorneys' fees and costs incurred as a result of this case, except for the costs a nd attorneys' fees incurred in litigating appeals, as further set out in order; 5) Malcolm Rance Newman may respond to any motion for attorney's fees not later than 14 days after being served with that motion; 6) On or before 12/22/2017, Ba rbara Holland shall (1) file and serve a proposed order granting her motion for relief from judgment; and (2) submit a copy of the proposed order, in Microsoft Word11 or Wordperfect format, to the following email address: propord_watkins@almd.uscourts.gov; DIRECTING the Clerk to serve a copy of this order on the following persons, as further set out in order; Copies mailed by CMRRR as directed. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 12/15/2017. (alm, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Holland v. MGA, Inc. et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?