Hudson v. Army Fleet Support, L.L.C.

Plaintiff: Joseph R. Hudson
Defendant: Army Fleet Support, L.L.C.
Case Number: 1:2007cv01050
Filed: November 29, 2007
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Dothan Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Referring Judge: Susan Russ Walker
Presiding Judge: William Keith Watkins
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 29:791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 15, 2009 53 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that AFS's 16 Motion for summary judgment is granted. An appropriate judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 7/15/09. (sl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hudson v. Army Fleet Support, L.L.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph R. Hudson
Represented By: Jimmy Douglas Jacobs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Army Fleet Support, L.L.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?