Rogers v. Army Fleet Support LLC

Plaintiff: Donnie Rogers
Defendant: Army Fleet Support LLC
Case Number: 1:2008cv00871
Filed: October 30, 2008
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations Office
County: Coffee
Presiding Judge: William Keith Watkins
Referring Judge: Wallace Capel
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 29:185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 13, 2009 25 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that AFS's 16 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and Mr. Rogers' claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. An appropriate judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 10/13/2009. (dmn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rogers v. Army Fleet Support LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donnie Rogers
Represented By: Benton Howard Persons, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Army Fleet Support LLC
Represented By: Kirk Cordell Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?