Bonci v. Army Fleet Support (MAG+)

Bonci v. Army Fleet Support (MAG+)

Plaintiff:	Janet A. Bonci
Defendant:	Army Fleet Support
Case Number:	1:2009cv00101
Filed:	February 5, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office:	Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County:	Dale
Presiding Judge:	Wallace Capel
Presiding Judge:	William Keith Watkins
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 5, 2009	Filing 32 ORDER ADOPTING 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; Mrs. Bonci's 2 Objection is OVERRULED; Army Fleet Support's 10 Motion to Dismiss, or, in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment, is GRANTED; Summary judgment is GRANTED to Army Fleet Support with respects to counts 1-4 of the complaint, and those counts are DISMISSED with prejudice; Counts 5-7 of the complaint (the state-law claims) are DISMISSED without prejudice; Ms. Bonci's 21 Motion to amend her complaint is DENIED as futile. Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 10/5/2009. (dmn)
August 6, 2009	Filing 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the 10 MOTION to Dismiss, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Army Fleet Support be GRANTED; Summary Judgment should be GRANTED as to claims one through four of the Complaint, and claims five through seven of the Complaint should be DISMISSED. In addition, the 21 MOTION to Amend be DENIED as futile. Objections to R&R due by 8/19/2009. Signed by Honorable Wallace Capel, Jr. on 8/6/2009. (dmn)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 5, 2009

Filing 32 ORDER ADOPTING 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; Mrs. Bonci's 2 Objection is OVERRULED; Army Fleet Support's 10 Motion to Dismiss, or, in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment, is GRANTED; Summary judgment is GRANTED to Army Fleet Support with respects to counts 1-4 of the complaint, and those counts are DISMISSED with prejudice; Counts 5-7 of the complaint (the state-law claims) are DISMISSED without prejudice; Ms. Bonci's 21 Motion to amend her complaint is DENIED as futile. Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 10/5/2009. (dmn)

August 6, 2009

Filing 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the 10 MOTION to Dismiss, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Army Fleet Support be GRANTED; Summary Judgment should be GRANTED as to claims one through four of the Complaint, and claims five through seven of the Complaint should be DISMISSED. In addition, the 21 MOTION to Amend be DENIED as futile. Objections to R&R due by 8/19/2009. Signed by Honorable Wallace Capel, Jr. on 8/6/2009. (dmn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bonci v. Army Fleet Support (MAG+)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Janet A. Bonci
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Army Fleet Support
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?