Yeomans v. Forster and Howell, Incorporated et al
| Cynthia Yeomans |
| Forster and Howell, Incorporated, Jack Howell and Nancy Jenkins |
| 1:2009cv00488 |
| May 26, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Dothan Office |
| Houston |
| W. Harold Albritton |
| Charles S. Coody |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER denying 43 alternative Motion to reconsider; denying 43 Motion to certify order for interlocutory appeal for reasons further set out in order. Signed by Honorable W. Harold Albritton, III on 12/11/2009. (br, )
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER LIFTING STAY and denying 37 MOTION to Extend the Stay for reasons further set out in the order. Signed by Honorable W. Harold Albritton, III on 11/30/09. (br, )
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER directing as follows: (1) the 33 MOTION to renew motion to stay proceedings pending outcome of criminal case is GRANTED to the extent that this case is STAYED until 11/30/2009; (2) the plf shall file an answer to the counterclaim no later than 11/30/09. Signed by Honorable W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/22/09. (djy, )
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER denying 19 Motion to Stay without prejudice to the Plaintiff again moving for a stay at a time later in these proceeding if special circumstances arise which warrant imposition of a stay. Signed by Honorable W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/10/2009. (cc, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
