Carter v. Gordon (INMATE2)
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|September 28, 2009
ORDER adopting 4 Report and Recommendations; that Plaintiff's § 1983 claims against Defendants Dothan Police Department, Houston County Sheriff's Department, and Judge Rose Gordon are DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with 28 U. S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii); that Plaintiff's § 1983 claims against Defendant Dothan Police Chief are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); that Plaintiff's challenge to the constitution ality of his current detention is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) as such claim is not properly before the court at this time; that this case is DISMISSED prior to service of process in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) - (iii). Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 9/28/2009. (cc, )
|September 2, 2009
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE that: 1. The § 1983 claims presented against Defendants Dothan Police Department, Houston County Sheriff's Department, and Judge Rose Gordon be DISMISSED with prejudice; 2. Plaintiff's § 1983 claims against Defendant Dothan Chief of Police be DISMISSED without prejudice; 3. Plaintiff's challenge to the constitutionality of his current detention be DISMISSED without prejudice as such claim is not properly before the court at this time; 4. This case be DISMISSED prior to service of process. Objections to R&R due by 9/15/2009. Signed by Honorable Wallace Capel, Jr on 9/2/09. (br, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?